Tag Archives: sf

Aussie Spec Fic Carnival

Ladies and gentlemen and others, here it is…

NaNoWriMo:
Andrew Macrae flunked out early, Stephen Dedman didn’t quite make it, but Martin Livings actually did it – and offered it for viewing.

Writing:
Ben Peek has posted a few episodes of Nowhere Near Savannah, this one being a favourite so far – reasons not to write science fiction.
Glenda Larke delivers her musings on staying true to your art, and being balanced; meanwhile mikandra has something of a writing crisis.
Cassiphone (aka Tansy Roberts) had a sneak peek of her latest novel, Power and Majesty, available for perusal (and made a rather wild claim to boot).
Gillian Pollack makes a very generous offer, should you be interested in experimenting for a travel scene in your next novel (no vegos allowed).
Tehani reflects on Andromeda Spaceways as it was in 2007.
Dirk Flinthart shares a his take on the story of the Ugly Duckling. Heart warming, but you can just imagine what’s coming at the end…
and another Stephen preens a little about the covers of some random books…

Publishing:
That old Punkrocker announces that Worker’s Paradise came back from the printers, and Karen Miller announces the publication of The Riven Kingdom (as well as keeping us up to date on the progress of her next); Girlie announces the impending arrival of Shiny 2.
Jennifer Fallon also gets into the shamelessly plugging friends act as well.
Seems obvious to me, but apparently “Kiss of the Lily” – which is wanting stories with romance – haven’t been getting what they want.
Margo discusses the new Datlow Del Rey antho, including herself; also comments on some reviews she’s received, as does Kaaron Warren on The Grinding House.

Reading:
That Ben Peek again has some interesting things to say about the Aussie military reading list.
James T Kirk School of Plot Development is elaborated by Gillian.
Matt discusses William Burroughs.
The token Kiwi has caused some stir with a variety of posts, on chronotopicality (also here) – sparking lots of comments, worth reading.
Last Short Story keeps doing their (OK, I admit, our) crazy thing, attempting to read the short specfic published in 2007.
Jonathan S reflects on re-viewing Star Wars (as well as thinking about feedback).

Also seen:
Chris Barnes gets all dressed up and fights some folks, progressing up the career ladder of Sword Fighting.
Cat Sparks posts some of her photos from World Con.
Girlie is rounding up support to help support ASiF! – a worthy cause if you like reviews, and there are even prizes! (She’s also had ideas about improving said website. Plus, Martin is offering to name characters after donaters.) Plus, some silly writing stunts.
Justine Larbalestier and partner Scott star in a podcast (there’s also a second half).
Paul continues his incredibly personal and humbling recount of his experience with cancer (that’s just one entry, of course).
Finally, there’s no show without Punch – or, in the case of the Aussie specifc scene, the Aurealis Awards, the list of which appeared a week or so ago now; it’s even scored itself a big fat sponsor. Numerous people blogged about, like those who got nominated (and while you’re there, check out Rob eating brains).

Star Trek Generations

Picard is better than Kirk

Kirk is better than Picard

I think Picard is my favourite. He’s just more… refined. Kirk makes Jon Mclean look like a choir boy. The thing that’s particularly funny about those lists (and there were quite a few that I didn’t get) is that a number of them are the same, word for word – yet on one list it’s bad and on the other, good.

So I’ve watched Star Trek Generations tonight. I don’t think I’d seen it before – although it’s possible that I saw it at my first O’Week party, back in the day (the cinema at uni was showing movies all night; I know I saw a Star Trek at maybe 1am – with the kir part of kirmish, as I recall – but don’t remember it at all; and no I wasn’t drunk, because the Melbourne Uni security team, in their wisdom, wouldn’t accept NT proof of age – only Victorian). What can I say? The effects are definitely better. I don’t like Riker much, Troi is a pain, and while Crusher is good she ain’t no Bones. Geordie (oooh, it jut occurred to me that that’s another UK slang reference, like Scotty… yes, I’m a bit slow) is ok, but no Scotty, and Data is a lesser version of Spock without the interesting reason for being all logical and cold. I think what I’m saying is that I want Picard with the original crew; that would be my ideal Star Trek!

Soren was a worthy adversary, with a very interesting reason for being a prat. It was fun seeing Kirk and Picard together (they’re in one other together, I believe?). Overall, quite a satisfying plot, I thought.

My final question, though: why is such a nice-looking planet as Viridian 3 uninhabited??

Star Trek VI

So all that stuff about odds and evens of Star Trek movies is, I have decided, crap. I just watched VI (man I love BigPond Movies!), and it was great. Right from the start it was obvious that it was made much more recently than V, because the effects were infinitely better. And the plot – there was one! And it was a good one! No faffing around at the start; an unexpected double-cross (for me to be surprised by a double-cross is quite unusual); and the acting was probably a bit better than it had been previously.

Kirk got emotion and a turn-around, Spock got devious, Bones got insulted… and Sulu got his own ship.

This one I am happy to recommend to most scifi buffs.

Oh – and Klingons quoting Shakespeare – brilliant! An interesting touch to make them more civilised, which throws the whole Klingons-as-brutes questions into the air and pushes Kirk, and the audience, into questioning the relationship between ‘civilised’ and not, and indeed what ‘civilised’ means.

I liked it.

And there’s a new Star Trek coming out next year, with Karl Urban as Bones! It’s set in the space academy, as a prequel – the original gang learning how to be the insubordinate types we know and love. I’m not entirely convinced, but I’ll probably go and see it.

Star Trek V

As part of my ongoing effort to watch all of the Star Trek movies, I finally saw this one a few days ago. I think I’ve mentioned before the odds/evens thing with them, and after the craptacular nature of IV I had hopes for V, although with some trepidation. Fortunately, it was most certainly better than IV – although that wasn’t hard. What felt like about the first third was a weird, let’s-get-to-know-the-characters-outside-of-the-ship thing… maybe their audience polling said that would play well? Me, I don’t need to hear Kirk and Bones singing “Row, row, row your boat.” And am I the only one who thought the suggestion of romance between Uhura and Scotty just a bit weird??

Anyway, the storyline was bearable; I quite liked the emotion-mad Vulcan, although most of the twists were predictable. I thought he was a good character, and they used him well. I also liked the way they managed to get yet another ego-tripping maniacal Klingon in there (and all the while reading subtitles, I couldn’t help but think of those people who ‘speak’ Klingon – figuring out syntax from subtitles is hard work!!). As always, I think Bones was my favourite. His acerbic wit and delight in calling Spock out as a nutter are highly enjoyable.

Probably not one for the casual movie viewer. You have to be a bit nuts to watch it, I think.

Daughters of Earth

I got my copy today from Amazon – hurrah!* So excited. I’ve been looking forward to reading this ever since cassiphone raved at me about it at NatCon in June. It has a very nice cover…. It’s been a while since I read any feminist theory or lit crit, so I’m itching to start. Of course, I have been somewhat remiss with my duties, so I have to get back to that… and send some hard copies out to collaborators, before they lynch me. So it might have to wait until my resolve weakens.

*Don’t know it? It’s edited by Justine Larbalestier, and includes scifi stories written by women throughout the 20th century – from every decade, I think – as well essays about them and their place in the scifi tradition.

Farthing Magazine: a rant

As in far-thing, not an old coin.

As part of Last Short Story, we’re obviously trying to cover all the paying markets. At the start of the year in particular, we had to buy any copy we wanted because very few people knew about the crazy idea and review copies were few and and far between (and always warmly welcomed). Now, things are getting a bit easier, and we’ve got a few more review copies coming in (generally warmly welcomed, with only a very quiet groan of: ‘what, more?’).

One of the magazines I volunteered to buy was Farthing Magazine. I thought it looked cool – they have a great quote from Ursula le Guin on the site! – and some interesting-sounding stories. I eventually managed to pay by Paypal, which was a bit of a saga in itself, and then… nothing.

That was June.

They definitely took my money – can’t even remember how much now. I’ve sent a number of emails to the editor’s contact email address. There is no way postage from the UK should take 4 months. Is there?

I’d love to hear from anyone who’s received Farthing – so that I know it can be done, and to know whether it’s something I should bother with chasing up. I really don’t want to just put zeros in its columns, on our little LSS spreadsheet…

Not reading Slaughterhouse 5

* I never have in the past. I know! Oh! the shame.

As a consequence, I borrowed it from the library for the holidays.

* I didn’t read it at the start of the hols because my sister was.

* I didn’t read it over the rest of the hols because the demands of Last Short Story were getting to me.

Now, it’s no longer the holidays. But that’s not why I’m still not reading the book….

* I managed to lose it. A library book!

Snapshot 2007: Geoff Maloney

 

Geoff Maloney is the author of numerous short stories, which can be found in such places as Orb #6, Aurealis #33/34/35, and Ticonderoga Online. He has also edited a few anthologies, such as the recent Fantastical Journeys to Brisbane, and can be found online here.

Q1: Fantastical Journeys to Brisbane came out this year, which you co-edited with Zoran Zivkovic. The title made me laugh, since Brisbane is not the sort of place I imagine having a fantastical journey towards! What has the response been like to this anthology, and what do you think of the final product?

I think the title needs to be looked at in a couple of ways. Firstly, the origin of the anthology goes back to Zoran Zivkovic’s visit to Australia as a guest writer at the 2004 Brisbane Writers’ Festival. At that time Zoran, who lives in Belgrade, Serbia, had recently won a World Fantasy Award for his novella, “The Library”. I had already made Zoran’s acquaintance through Kirsten Bishop and the fact that we were both involved with Prime Books in the US at that time. While he was in Brisbane, Zoran held a writers’ masterclass for the Queensland Writers’ Centre and, out of that class, “The Devil in Brisbane“ was born. Zoran was very keen to follow this up with a second anthology and so “Fantastical Journeys to Brisbane“ was launched. This time Trent Jamieson came onboard to help with the selection of the stories and assist with the editing process. Trent‘s experience from his work on “Redsine” was invaluable.

While we in Australia think of Brisbane as just another Australian city and one perhaps with a politically shady past the reality is that for many people in the northern hemisphere Brisbane is exotic and just the sort of place you might have a magical journey to. As the publisher is Izvori in Zagreb, Croatia, this is entirely suitable.

Secondly, by grounding the anthology in a named city, we were able to give writers, who wished to contribute, clear directions we were after stories that were in the nature of travelling or returning to an urban destination, and this would avoid getting many stories that were set in the “inexplicable nowhere”. The writers handled this concept extremely well and if Brisbane wasn’t exotic to people in Australia before, it should be now. As we say in the promo for the book:

Inspired by World Fantasy Award winner Zoran Zivkovic’s mosaic novella, “Compartments”, each writer has crafted their own special tale of a journey to the mythical city of Brisbane. It is a place that only appears on the map of the imagination, a place where suspected terrorists and supernatural beings are incarcerated, where renegade cyborgs and lads from the bush seek salvation… a city awaiting the arrival of the new messiah, while malevolent water-spirits wander the reaches of its river. It is also the place your aunties visit on holidays of transformation and others find their own special road to heaven and hell.

At this stage, it’s too early to gauge the response. We’ve had a review at ASif! which everybody agreed was pretty good, but we’re only just starting to get some local distribution, and haven’t got the Izvori website set-up yet for European and international sales. All of that is coming soon.

Coming from Izvori in Croatia, the production quality of this book is unique and exceptional. It’s in a hard cover format that is often used in Croatia. The cover is like a sunny day in Brisbane, and the internal layout, which was done by Damir Mikulicic at Izvori, is one of the best I’ve ever seen.

 

Q2: Ben Peek interviewed you for the ancestor of this project, Snapshot 2005. In it, Peek asked your opinion on the Aussie scene, and one of your comments was about the short story scene: “Personally, I like short stories, but if I was a person who really wanted to write novels in Australia, I wouldn’t go anywhere near the short story market. There’s very little money in it and the time it takes to write several short stories would be much better spent on writing your next novel…”. Do you think this still holds true for the Aussie scene, two years later? And if it does, is there anything we can do about it?

Yes, I think it’s still true. It’s a model that American friends tell me works in the US, but I don’t think it ever has in Australia. I think the only thing to be done is to be careful not to assume that US publishing advice applies in Australia. It simply means that Australian writers shouldn’t feel compelled in any way to write short stories if they’re aiming to get a novel published in the local market.

It’s a fact of life at the moment that short stories are just not as popular as they used to be, but neither are slim novels. The long novel is very popular across most genres.

Impossible to say whether that will change. But nobody should start writing short stories thinking they can make a career out of it. You write them because you personally like the form, or to be perfectly pragmatic because you simply don’t have the time to commit to writing long novels.

Although I do have a few novel drafts in the bottom drawer.

Q3: You’ve been involved in editing two anthologies with Zoran Zivkovic in the past, The Devil in Brisbane and Fantastical Journeys to Brisbane. Do you see yourself being involved in more anthologies and editing over the next five years, or concentrating solely on your own writing?

I also did the editorial work on the first CSFG anthology, “Nor of Human” and had a range of editorial roles in relation to Lee Battersby and Paul Haines’ collections through Prime Books. I was also guest editor on Znak Sagite #15, which Bill Congreve contributed an article for on the state of Australian speculative fiction, and included some great stories by Australian writers. Anybody in Australia who has seen a copy of that magazine has been very impressed by its quite amazing art work. They couldn’t read it, however, because it’s all in Serbian.

Overall, I see myself as a writer, not an editor, although I’m quite proud of the editorial work I’ve done. The editorial role has mostly come about because I’ve been invited to do it, by Zoran and others. But I should make the point that my role in production of the books has only been that of editor. Unlike Russell Farr at Ticonderoga or Cat Sparks at Agog! or Angela Challis at Brimstone, I haven’t had to worry about publishing the book as well.

So, no, I’m not actively seeking editorial opportunities. Not sure at this stage if Zoran has any future plans; you never know what Zoran has up his sleeve. He is quite a magician.

And, you know, my short stories continue to get published, here and overseas, and I’m happy about that. I was published in the first issue of Aurealis and I’ll have a story coming out in the next issue. I guess some people would think that’s bad. I think it’s good.

I don’t actually think of things in terms of my writing career or “my editorial career”. Writing is important to me, but when I put the editor’s hat on its important to me too. When I go to my day job, working on housing policy issues, it’s important as well, and bringing up three young daughters with my wife Diana is possibly the most important thing I could ever do. It’s more about having a life where writing plays an important part, rather than writing or editing being the only thing you do.

Q4: Along with working and so forth, I presume you’ve had time to relax and read: what’s the best thing you’ve read this year?

People who know me know that I have a passion for European fiction, especially Russian writers, and if they write dark urban fantasies with a wicked sense of humour that’s even better. The best novel I read this year was the Master and Margarita by Mikhail Bulgakov. It’s a classic of speculative fiction. Masterful writing and wonderful story-telling. The other best novel I read was also by Bulgakov, The White Guard about the fall of Kiev during the Russian Revolution. Not speculative fiction, but a must read book for anybody who is interested in the techniques of writing. Just brilliant writing from start to finish, and a marvellous historical story.

Q5: And, to finish in a totally shameless way: you’ve got the chance to get it on with any fictional character. Who would it be?

Does Samantha in Bewitched count?

 

FarScape Season 3

So I really wondered how they would resove the whole two-Crichton thing.

Ouch.

Most definitely not what I expected. Impressive, while heart-breaking.

Playing hookey

Not with work or anything, but with my responsibilities. Instead of reading some of the anthologies waiting for me, I’ve got Ilium, by Dan Simmons, to read. It’s mine, it’s just been with someone else for an awfully long time. Long enough that I’ve bought the sequel, Olympos, and haven’t read it yet – despite the fact that my hands almost literally itch every time I see it lying there on my bookshelf – because I must re-read the first so that it’s clear in my mind.

I love this book. I love it a lot. In fact, I love almost everything by Simmons, but that’s another issue. There aren’t too many books that manage to combine the Trojan stories with lovely, breath-taking scifi (yeh, OK, there’s Simon Brown’s Troy anthology – did I mention and I did a podcast on it?! – but short stories are a different teapot of eels from a full-blown space opera epic novel). It confused me delightfully the first time I read it, and I am loving reading it again – because I already know what various things mean, but there’s a lot of detail that I’ve forgotten and it’s just wonderful.

Pity I didn’t get this at the start of the holidays… as it is, I’m going to have to play a little bit of hookey when I go back to school next week, as I’ve got too much on this weekend to be able to finish it…