A number of reviews over on goodreads seem to have two things in common: the reviewer hasn’t read the source material, and they didn’t particularly enjoy this collection. I applaud someone for stepping out of their comfort zone, but I really don’t understand bagging something when the fundamental context isn’t understood. Because this really, really doesn’t stand stand with knowledge of The Iliad and The Odyssey, and it doesn’t pretend it even wants to.
I adored this collection, and I am fantastically thankful that I happened to pick it up a few years ago at the closing-down sale of my favourite bookshop (which has since reopened!). I’m not an author, but I would suggest that anyone who wants to write short fiction – and who has the background – should read this, because it does the short form in glorious, scintillating ways.
The Preface claims that this set of 44 stories translated from variations to the standard Homeric tale found in Oxyrhynchus. I’ll admit that for the first couple of stories I actually half-wondered whether this might possibly be true – I’d never heard of such a find, but Oxyrhynchus has been an incredible literary treasure trove; it’s not like I work consistently in the field so it’s feasible I might have missed hearing about it. I fairly quickly decided that this wasn’t the case, but it doesn’t matter in the slightest. I feel that Mason has stayed true to the core of the mythology, and what more could you want?
Some of the stories presented here are vignettes, others are more substantial stories. Most of them take aspects of The Odyssey and… shift them. Sometimes subtly, sometimes extravagantly, but almost always with that kernel that means it feels basically plausible to an archaic Greek mythological milieu. There are a few that stray beyond those bounds, but even those are wonderfully well written, so I don’t mind. They too help to build up sense of shifting possibilities, what-ifs and could-have-beens. There are a few stories that take aspects from other parts of Greek mythology and tie them, in convoluted but logical ways, to the Troy story; and just one or two that could feasibly be set outside of the 13th century BC, but not with any firm proof that they do so.
A review of all 44 stories would be tiresome and, in some cases, impossible without ruining the sheer pleasure of the reading act. Suffice it to say that Penelope gets some attention, Athene a bit more, and Calypso and Circe a lesser bit. Most of them involve travelling, which is naturally appropriate; some are in Troy and some on Ithaka. Sometimes Odysseus is triumphant, other times a coward, and occasionally seen through others’ eyes – like Polyphemus (sorry, bad joke). Once, Paris is Death. Occasionally, the reality of a two-decade absence is hinted at. Tragically, Hektor does not feature in any meaningful way.
This collection is wonderful and glorious and I loved it very much.
[…] Metal Evolution; We Who Are About to…, Joanna Russ; CSZ special on Joanna Russ; The Lost Books of the Odyssey, Zachary […]
Great review (especially in combination with your Galactic Suburbia comments), I never heard of the book but now really want to read it.
Great review, I never heard of the book but now I really want to find and read it. (your comments in galactic suburbia also helped)
Thanks! It is seriously awesome and I hope more people get into it 🙂
Heard your comments on this on GS, Alex. This is definitely up MY alley. 🙂
My library had a copy :), and it is as great as you promised.
It connects back to some of my gateways into enjoying reading, history, fairytales, mythology and genre.
Some of the stories read as pure mythology, some as fables, Borgesian stories, genre shorts (a bit like Fredric Brown), drifting at times into horror, history, thousand-and-one-night, with some hints of Chinese storytelling even.
The footnotes seem to be part of the meta-level of the book, at times mentioning things anyone reading the book should know at times expanding the stories in a few sentences.
And the recurring mentions of physical books (uncut ones at that) due to their utter unsuitability to the setting pull the whole work in a universe of its own.
(ps sorry about the double post above, I tend to get into fights with wordpress)
Borgesian!! Yes it is! I haven’t read Labyrinths in such a long time but you’re so right – definitely resonance here.
Also – omg I hadn’t connected with the discussion of physical books – how embarrassing…
I’m glad you found and read this so quickly; you’ve put my mind to rest about whether I was just imagining its awesomeness.
Usually I put books on a virtual ‘to read at some point in the future list’ where it remains by encountering the author or the title in different contexts. This one seemed too nice and too specialist to put it through that process, so I jumped it to the front of the queue when I saw the library had a copy. The risk that I’d forget about it when I put reading it off was a bit large.
I think the stories work best for people that are somewhat familiar with the background. And can let go of what they know to accept the variations to completely enjoy the awesomeness.
And it probably also helps if people like the at times dreamlike, fairytale or mythological style of the stories.