MI 3

We went to see Mission Impossible 3 the other day.  In Director’s Lounge, no less, which was incredibly (ridiculously) fun.

It was OK.  Personally I thought there was too much blah-blah romance, but there was a goodly amount of explosions and adventure too.  Cruise is pretty good; Ving Rhames isn’t in it nearly enough.  Neither is Phillip Seymour Hoffman.  I think that, just like in no.2, the movie doesn’t actually spend enough time establishing the villain.  The goody is obviously the goody, and always is, but the villain needs some sort of reason to be a baddy, I think.

Anyway, it was fun.

One response

  1. James's avatar

    “Personally I thought there was too much blah-blah romance, but there was a goodly amount of explosions and adventure too.”

    Do I have the best wife or what !

Leave a reply to James Cancel reply